Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (Global ICBMs) are among the most powerful weapons ever developed. Designed to carry nuclear or conventional warheads across continents, they form the backbone of strategic deterrence for major powers. Only a handful of countries—the United States, Russia, China, India, France, and, in a limited capacity, North Korea—have developed or deployed such systems.
India’s Agni-5 missile represents its entry into the elite group of nations with long-range ICBM-class capabilities. While it is often called an “ICBM,” its range of ~5,000–5,500 km places it at the lower threshold of the category. Still, Agni-5 is strategically significant for India’s security, especially when compared with similar systems from global powers.
This article provides a comparative analysis of Agni-5 and other global ICBMs, covering their specifications, ranges, features, and strategic roles.
1) Understanding ICBMs and Their Role in Deterrence
What is an ICBM?
An Intercontinental Ballistic Missile is a missile with a minimum range of 5,500 km, capable of delivering nuclear or conventional warheads to targets across continents. They typically have:
- Multi-stage propulsion systems (solid or liquid fuel).
- Warheads (single, multiple, or MIRVs – Multiple Independently targetable Reentry Vehicles).
- Guidance systems for accuracy.
- Launch platforms: land-based silos, road/rail-mobile launchers, or submarine-based systems.
Role in Strategic Deterrence
ICBMs are not designed for conventional warfare. Their primary purpose is nuclear deterrence—ensuring that no adversary can strike without facing devastating retaliation. This concept underpins doctrines like:
- Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) – U.S. and Soviet doctrine during the Cold War.
- Credible Minimum Deterrence – India’s doctrine, emphasizing sufficient, not excessive, capability.

2) Agni-5: India’s ICBM-Class Missile
Key Specifications of Agni-5
Feature | Details |
---|---|
Type | ICBM-class, nuclear-capable |
Range | 5,000–5,500 km |
Stages | 3 (solid fuel) |
Length | ~17–20 meters |
Weight | 50–55 tonnes |
Payload Capacity | ~1,500 kg |
Warhead | Single nuclear/conventional, MIRV-capable |
Guidance | INS with satellite updates (NavIC/GPS/GLONASS) |
Accuracy (CEP) | <50 meters (estimated) |
Launch Platform | Road-mobile canisterized TEL (Transporter-Erector-Launcher) |
Status | Inducted into Strategic Forces Command (SFC) |
Agni-5 gives India the ability to hold at risk all of China, Pakistan, and parts of Europe, significantly strengthening its deterrence posture. Its canisterized, road-mobile system increases survivability and makes it harder for adversaries to preemptively neutralize.
3) U.S. ICBMs
a) LGM-30G Minuteman III
The U.S. Air Force’s Minuteman III is the backbone of America’s land-based ICBM force.
Feature | Details |
---|---|
Range | ~13,000 km |
Stages | 3 (solid fuel) |
Payload | ~1,150 kg |
Warhead Options | Up to 3 MIRVs (W78 or W87 nuclear warheads) |
Accuracy (CEP) | ~120 meters |
Launch Platform | Silo-based |
Status | Operational since 1970, continuously upgraded |
Strengths: Extremely reliable, advanced guidance, MIRV capability, global reach.
Limitations: Silo-based (fixed location), making them more vulnerable than mobile ICBMs.
b) LGM-35A Sentinel (Next-Gen ICBM)
The U.S. is currently developing the Sentinel ICBM, which will replace the Minuteman III by the 2030s. It promises greater survivability, cyber resilience, and modern warhead compatibility.
4) Russian ICBMs
Russia possesses the largest and most diverse ICBM arsenal in the world.
a) RS-24 Yars
Feature | Details |
---|---|
Range | ~12,000 km |
Stages | 3 (solid fuel) |
Payload | ~1,200–1,500 kg |
Warheads | Up to 6 MIRVs |
Launch Platform | Road-mobile TELs and silos |
Status | Operational since 2010 |
Yars combines mobility with MIRV capability, making it one of the most survivable ICBMs globally.
b) RS-28 Sarmat (“Satan II”)
This super-heavy ICBM is under deployment.
Feature | Details |
---|---|
Range | 18,000+ km |
Payload | ~10 tonnes |
Warheads | 10–15 MIRVs or hypersonic glide vehicles |
Launch Platform | Silo-based |
Status | Deployment in progress |
Sarmat is designed to evade U.S. missile defenses with sheer payload volume and unpredictable flight paths.
5) Chinese ICBMs
China’s missile program has advanced rapidly, aiming to deter both India and the U.S.
a) DF-31A
Feature | Details |
---|---|
Range | ~11,200 km |
Stages | 3 (solid fuel) |
Payload | ~1,050 kg |
Warheads | Single/MIRV capable |
Launch Platform | Road-mobile TEL |
Status | Operational |
b) DF-41
China’s most powerful ICBM.

Feature | Details |
---|---|
Range | 12,000–15,000 km |
Payload | Up to 10 MIRVs |
Warheads | Nuclear MIRVs |
Launch Platform | Road-mobile TEL, silo, rail |
Status | Inducted in 2019 |
The DF-41 rivals Russia’s RS-24 Yars and U.S. Minuteman III in capability, providing China with true global strike range.
6) France’s ICBMs
France maintains a small but credible nuclear deterrent.
- M51 SLBM (submarine-launched ballistic missile)
- Range: ~10,000 km
- Warheads: 6 MIRVs (TN-75 or TNO)
- Platform: Triomphant-class nuclear submarines
France does not maintain land-based ICBMs; its nuclear deterrent relies heavily on submarine-based missiles.
7) North Korea’s Emerging ICBMs
North Korea has tested several long-range missiles, though their operational reliability remains debated.
- Hwasong-15
- Range: ~13,000 km (theoretically)
- Warheads: Single nuclear (MIRV capability unproven)
- Platform: Road-mobile TEL
- Hwasong-17 (claimed “monster missile”)
- Range: ~15,000 km
- Payload: Large, possibly multiple warheads
- Status: Tested but reliability uncertain
North Korea’s ICBMs are more about political signaling than reliable deterrence, given limited testing and questionable accuracy.
8) Comparative Table: Agni-5 vs Global ICBMs
Missile | Country | Range (km) | Stages | Payload | Warheads | Launch Platform | MIRV Capable |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agni-5 | India | 5,000–5,500 | 3 (solid) | 1,500 kg | 1–3 (MIRV in future) | Canisterized TEL | Yes (tested 2024) |
Minuteman III | USA | 13,000 | 3 (solid) | 1,150 kg | Up to 3 | Silo | Yes |
RS-24 Yars | Russia | 12,000 | 3 (solid) | 1,200 kg | Up to 6 | TEL, Silo | Yes |
RS-28 Sarmat | Russia | 18,000+ | Liquid | 10 tonnes | 10–15 | Silo | Yes |
DF-31A | China | 11,200 | 3 (solid) | 1,050 kg | 1–3 | TEL | Yes |
DF-41 | China | 12,000–15,000 | 3 (solid) | 2,500 kg | Up to 10 | TEL, Silo, Rail | Yes |
M51 SLBM | France | 10,000 | 3 (solid) | ~1,200 kg | Up to 6 | Submarine | Yes |
Hwasong-15 | N. Korea | ~13,000 | 2–3 | Large | 1 | TEL | Claimed |
Hwasong-17 | N. Korea | ~15,000 | 3 (liquid) | Very large | Multiple (unproven) | TEL | Claimed |
9) Key Comparative Insights
- Range:
- Russia and China dominate with missiles exceeding 12,000 km.
- The U.S. Minuteman III also has intercontinental reach.
- Agni-5, at 5,500 km, is shorter in range but sufficient for India’s regional deterrence needs (mainly China and Pakistan).
- Warhead Capability:
- U.S., Russia, and China deploy fully operational MIRVs.
- India has recently demonstrated MIRV capability with Agni-5 but on a smaller scale.
- North Korea’s MIRV claims remain unverified.
- Launch Platforms:
- Agni-5 is road-mobile and canisterized, giving it survivability advantages similar to Russia’s Yars and China’s DF-41.
- U.S. ICBMs remain silo-based, though highly protected.
- Russia and China employ diverse basing: silos, road-mobiles, and rail launchers.
- Doctrine:
- U.S. & Russia: Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), with massive arsenals.
- China: Minimal deterrence with survivability, now shifting to MIRV deployment.
- India: Credible Minimum Deterrence with No First Use (NFU) doctrine.
- North Korea: Ambiguous, leaning on nuclear coercion and signaling.

10) Strategic Implications of Agni-5
- Regional Security: Agni-5 covers all of China and Pakistan, India’s primary adversaries, ensuring credible retaliation capability.
- Survivability: Its canisterized TEL system enhances survivability compared to older, silo-based missiles.
- MIRV Future: With successful MIRV tests, Agni-5 can counter enemy missile defenses.
- Global Comparison: While India’s missile is shorter in range than U.S., Russian, or Chinese systems, it is tailored for India’s strategic needs, avoiding unnecessary overkill.
11) Conclusion
The Agni-5 missile marks India’s entry into the exclusive club of nations with ICBM-class capabilities. Compared to U.S., Russian, and Chinese ICBMs, its range is shorter, but this is by design. India follows a doctrine of credible minimum deterrence, meaning Agni-5 is designed to deter adversaries in its immediate and extended neighborhood—not to project power globally.
When compared to Russia’s RS-28 Sarmat or China’s DF-41, Agni-5 may seem modest. But within the South Asian and Asian strategic context, it is a gamechanger. Its mobility, accuracy, and future MIRV capabilities make it a credible, survivable deterrent.
Thus, Agni-5 may not rival the longest-range ICBMs in sheer firepower, but it holds its own as a regionally optimized, technologically advanced, and strategically significant missile system that strengthens India’s nuclear doctrine and deterrence posture.