Gadgets, Indian Politics, Inspiration, International, Tech, Technology

Agni 5 vs Other Global ICBMs: A Comparative Analysis

Agni 5 vs Other Global ICBMs: A Comparative Analysis

Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (Global ICBMs) are among the most powerful weapons ever developed. Designed to carry nuclear or conventional warheads across continents, they form the backbone of strategic deterrence for major powers. Only a handful of countries—the United States, Russia, China, India, France, and, in a limited capacity, North Korea—have developed or deployed such systems.

India’s Agni-5 missile represents its entry into the elite group of nations with long-range ICBM-class capabilities. While it is often called an “ICBM,” its range of ~5,000–5,500 km places it at the lower threshold of the category. Still, Agni-5 is strategically significant for India’s security, especially when compared with similar systems from global powers.

This article provides a comparative analysis of Agni-5 and other global ICBMs, covering their specifications, ranges, features, and strategic roles.


1) Understanding ICBMs and Their Role in Deterrence

What is an ICBM?

An Intercontinental Ballistic Missile is a missile with a minimum range of 5,500 km, capable of delivering nuclear or conventional warheads to targets across continents. They typically have:

  • Multi-stage propulsion systems (solid or liquid fuel).
  • Warheads (single, multiple, or MIRVs – Multiple Independently targetable Reentry Vehicles).
  • Guidance systems for accuracy.
  • Launch platforms: land-based silos, road/rail-mobile launchers, or submarine-based systems.

Role in Strategic Deterrence

ICBMs are not designed for conventional warfare. Their primary purpose is nuclear deterrence—ensuring that no adversary can strike without facing devastating retaliation. This concept underpins doctrines like:

  • Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) – U.S. and Soviet doctrine during the Cold War.
  • Credible Minimum Deterrence – India’s doctrine, emphasizing sufficient, not excessive, capability.
Agni 5 vs Other Global ICBMs: A Comparative Analysis

2) Agni-5: India’s ICBM-Class Missile

Key Specifications of Agni-5

FeatureDetails
TypeICBM-class, nuclear-capable
Range5,000–5,500 km
Stages3 (solid fuel)
Length~17–20 meters
Weight50–55 tonnes
Payload Capacity~1,500 kg
WarheadSingle nuclear/conventional, MIRV-capable
GuidanceINS with satellite updates (NavIC/GPS/GLONASS)
Accuracy (CEP)<50 meters (estimated)
Launch PlatformRoad-mobile canisterized TEL (Transporter-Erector-Launcher)
StatusInducted into Strategic Forces Command (SFC)

Agni-5 gives India the ability to hold at risk all of China, Pakistan, and parts of Europe, significantly strengthening its deterrence posture. Its canisterized, road-mobile system increases survivability and makes it harder for adversaries to preemptively neutralize.


3) U.S. ICBMs

a) LGM-30G Minuteman III

The U.S. Air Force’s Minuteman III is the backbone of America’s land-based ICBM force.

FeatureDetails
Range~13,000 km
Stages3 (solid fuel)
Payload~1,150 kg
Warhead OptionsUp to 3 MIRVs (W78 or W87 nuclear warheads)
Accuracy (CEP)~120 meters
Launch PlatformSilo-based
StatusOperational since 1970, continuously upgraded

Strengths: Extremely reliable, advanced guidance, MIRV capability, global reach.
Limitations: Silo-based (fixed location), making them more vulnerable than mobile ICBMs.

b) LGM-35A Sentinel (Next-Gen ICBM)

The U.S. is currently developing the Sentinel ICBM, which will replace the Minuteman III by the 2030s. It promises greater survivability, cyber resilience, and modern warhead compatibility.


4) Russian ICBMs

Russia possesses the largest and most diverse ICBM arsenal in the world.

a) RS-24 Yars

FeatureDetails
Range~12,000 km
Stages3 (solid fuel)
Payload~1,200–1,500 kg
WarheadsUp to 6 MIRVs
Launch PlatformRoad-mobile TELs and silos
StatusOperational since 2010

Yars combines mobility with MIRV capability, making it one of the most survivable ICBMs globally.

b) RS-28 Sarmat (“Satan II”)

This super-heavy ICBM is under deployment.

FeatureDetails
Range18,000+ km
Payload~10 tonnes
Warheads10–15 MIRVs or hypersonic glide vehicles
Launch PlatformSilo-based
StatusDeployment in progress

Sarmat is designed to evade U.S. missile defenses with sheer payload volume and unpredictable flight paths.


5) Chinese ICBMs

China’s missile program has advanced rapidly, aiming to deter both India and the U.S.

a) DF-31A

FeatureDetails
Range~11,200 km
Stages3 (solid fuel)
Payload~1,050 kg
WarheadsSingle/MIRV capable
Launch PlatformRoad-mobile TEL
StatusOperational

b) DF-41

China’s most powerful ICBM.

Agni 5 vs Other Global ICBMs: A Comparative Analysis
FeatureDetails
Range12,000–15,000 km
PayloadUp to 10 MIRVs
WarheadsNuclear MIRVs
Launch PlatformRoad-mobile TEL, silo, rail
StatusInducted in 2019

The DF-41 rivals Russia’s RS-24 Yars and U.S. Minuteman III in capability, providing China with true global strike range.


6) France’s ICBMs

France maintains a small but credible nuclear deterrent.

  • M51 SLBM (submarine-launched ballistic missile)
    • Range: ~10,000 km
    • Warheads: 6 MIRVs (TN-75 or TNO)
    • Platform: Triomphant-class nuclear submarines

France does not maintain land-based ICBMs; its nuclear deterrent relies heavily on submarine-based missiles.


7) North Korea’s Emerging ICBMs

North Korea has tested several long-range missiles, though their operational reliability remains debated.

  • Hwasong-15
    • Range: ~13,000 km (theoretically)
    • Warheads: Single nuclear (MIRV capability unproven)
    • Platform: Road-mobile TEL
  • Hwasong-17 (claimed “monster missile”)
    • Range: ~15,000 km
    • Payload: Large, possibly multiple warheads
    • Status: Tested but reliability uncertain

North Korea’s ICBMs are more about political signaling than reliable deterrence, given limited testing and questionable accuracy.


8) Comparative Table: Agni-5 vs Global ICBMs

MissileCountryRange (km)StagesPayloadWarheadsLaunch PlatformMIRV Capable
Agni-5India5,000–5,5003 (solid)1,500 kg1–3 (MIRV in future)Canisterized TELYes (tested 2024)
Minuteman IIIUSA13,0003 (solid)1,150 kgUp to 3SiloYes
RS-24 YarsRussia12,0003 (solid)1,200 kgUp to 6TEL, SiloYes
RS-28 SarmatRussia18,000+Liquid10 tonnes10–15SiloYes
DF-31AChina11,2003 (solid)1,050 kg1–3TELYes
DF-41China12,000–15,0003 (solid)2,500 kgUp to 10TEL, Silo, RailYes
M51 SLBMFrance10,0003 (solid)~1,200 kgUp to 6SubmarineYes
Hwasong-15N. Korea~13,0002–3Large1TELClaimed
Hwasong-17N. Korea~15,0003 (liquid)Very largeMultiple (unproven)TELClaimed

9) Key Comparative Insights

  1. Range:
    • Russia and China dominate with missiles exceeding 12,000 km.
    • The U.S. Minuteman III also has intercontinental reach.
    • Agni-5, at 5,500 km, is shorter in range but sufficient for India’s regional deterrence needs (mainly China and Pakistan).
  2. Warhead Capability:
    • U.S., Russia, and China deploy fully operational MIRVs.
    • India has recently demonstrated MIRV capability with Agni-5 but on a smaller scale.
    • North Korea’s MIRV claims remain unverified.
  3. Launch Platforms:
    • Agni-5 is road-mobile and canisterized, giving it survivability advantages similar to Russia’s Yars and China’s DF-41.
    • U.S. ICBMs remain silo-based, though highly protected.
    • Russia and China employ diverse basing: silos, road-mobiles, and rail launchers.
  4. Doctrine:
    • U.S. & Russia: Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), with massive arsenals.
    • China: Minimal deterrence with survivability, now shifting to MIRV deployment.
    • India: Credible Minimum Deterrence with No First Use (NFU) doctrine.
    • North Korea: Ambiguous, leaning on nuclear coercion and signaling.
Agni 5 vs Other Global ICBMs: A Comparative Analysis

10) Strategic Implications of Agni-5

  • Regional Security: Agni-5 covers all of China and Pakistan, India’s primary adversaries, ensuring credible retaliation capability.
  • Survivability: Its canisterized TEL system enhances survivability compared to older, silo-based missiles.
  • MIRV Future: With successful MIRV tests, Agni-5 can counter enemy missile defenses.
  • Global Comparison: While India’s missile is shorter in range than U.S., Russian, or Chinese systems, it is tailored for India’s strategic needs, avoiding unnecessary overkill.

11) Conclusion

The Agni-5 missile marks India’s entry into the exclusive club of nations with ICBM-class capabilities. Compared to U.S., Russian, and Chinese ICBMs, its range is shorter, but this is by design. India follows a doctrine of credible minimum deterrence, meaning Agni-5 is designed to deter adversaries in its immediate and extended neighborhood—not to project power globally.

When compared to Russia’s RS-28 Sarmat or China’s DF-41, Agni-5 may seem modest. But within the South Asian and Asian strategic context, it is a gamechanger. Its mobility, accuracy, and future MIRV capabilities make it a credible, survivable deterrent.

Thus, Agni-5 may not rival the longest-range ICBMs in sheer firepower, but it holds its own as a regionally optimized, technologically advanced, and strategically significant missile system that strengthens India’s nuclear doctrine and deterrence posture.


Related Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments